Although all humans are of the same species, with the same overall body parts, there are a number of attributes that are specific to each individual, even in the case of identical twins. These specifics come in handy when it comes to solving crimes.
During grad school, I had the good fortune of completing a
Directed Independent Study at the C.A. Pound Human Identification Lab, located on the
outskirts of the University of Florida campus. I trained under the assistant director, Dr. Michael Warren, who would go on to play a leading
forensic role in the infamous Casey Anthony trial. The training was meant to
supplement my studies in bioarchaeology, for both forensic anthropology and
bioarchaeology utilize many of the same techniques. Both specialties rely on
the examination of the skeleton; however, bioarchaeology deals with ancient
remains while forensics focuses on contemporary deaths – typically those
occurring within the past fifty years.
Working at the Pound Lab was a great experience. Each day,
Michael would pull a box from the back shelves where the old cases reside and I
would set to work on the remains, placing the bones in anatomical order,
determining the age, sex, and height of the person, and noting any pathologies
and unique identifiers, such as dental work or skeletal anomalies. From X-raying decapitated heads to defleshing a young girl, my work at the lab
provided an up-close-and-personal glimpse of forensic science (along with a few
cases of the dry heaves).
So I thought we would explore how our bodies serve as
evidence – not as victims, but as perpetrators. Let’s examine the clues our
bodies leave behind.
Say you commit a heinous crime, one that includes the deadly
duo of rape and murder. There are myriad ways you can be linked to that
crime. Let’s start with the tried-and-true method, fingerprints.
No two people share the same fingerprint. Even identical twins, who have the same DNA, will have differences in their fingerprints,
since the “friction ridge skin,” as it is known in professional circles, is a
result of many environmental factors, such as bone growth and conditions within
the womb. And although Sir William James Herschel is credited with being the
first to use fingerprints as a means of identification back in 1858, it seems
the Chinese were about two thousand years ahead of the curve.
In “The Volume of Crime Scene Investigation - Burglary,” dated to around 200 B.C., the Chinese mention the use of handprints as evidence. They were also using fingerprints on clay seals to secure documents, which is pretty clever, considering they wouldn’t invent paper for another three hundred years.
In “The Volume of Crime Scene Investigation - Burglary,” dated to around 200 B.C., the Chinese mention the use of handprints as evidence. They were also using fingerprints on clay seals to secure documents, which is pretty clever, considering they wouldn’t invent paper for another three hundred years.
It wasn’t until 1892 that fingerprints were first used to
solve a homicide. That accomplishment goes to Argentina, whose Buenos Aires
sleuths relied on prints to solve the Rojas murder case in which the mother of
two brutally slain boys eventually confessed after her bloody fingerprint was
identified at the crime scene.
But fingerprints are just the start of the biological trail.
Let’s talk semen.
There are usually about two hundred million sperm swimming within a
single ejaculate, making it the perfect fluid for DNA analysis. Even
individuals who can’t produce sperm (aspermiacs) and those who have been
clipped (vasectomized) can still be identified based on their seminal fluid.
The test for semen at a crime scene is cheerfully known as “The Christmas Tree
Stain,” since the reagents stain the sperm in blues, greens, and reds. Once the
sperm are recovered, the DNA packed within each little swimmer can be matched
to a culprit.
But semen is just one of several bodily fluids used in
identification. Blood is another popular means of narrowing down, or eliminating, suspects.
By identifying the grouping (A, B, O, or AB), the presence of Rhesus antigens
(Rh factor), and certain genes, investigators are able to match or
disqualify an individual based on their results.
Saliva is another common fluid recovered at crime scenes. It
can be found on the victim, as can bite marks, or left on objects such as cigarette
butts, glasse,s or cans of soda, and is another valuable source of DNA. But bodily
fluids, which fall under the specialty of “forensic serology,” also include
anything excreted or secreted from the body, including urine, vomit, oils
from the skin, and feces.
And let’s not forget about hair. The human body sports around five million hair follicles. On average, we lose around one hundred hairs per day. The length and quality of the hair is based on the region of the body from which it sprouts and ancestry dictates whether it is light, dark, straight, or kinky. Microscopic characteristics of hair enable investigators to differentiate between individuals and to determine whether the hair has been chemically altered, thus providing another link between suspect and crime scene.
And let’s not forget about hair. The human body sports around five million hair follicles. On average, we lose around one hundred hairs per day. The length and quality of the hair is based on the region of the body from which it sprouts and ancestry dictates whether it is light, dark, straight, or kinky. Microscopic characteristics of hair enable investigators to differentiate between individuals and to determine whether the hair has been chemically altered, thus providing another link between suspect and crime scene.
Whether it’s semen, blood, spit, or hair, our
bodies, as living organisms, leave behind a biological trail. And as the
science of forensics becomes more exact, that trail becomes easier to follow.
Here's the Smithsonian's excellent interactive website on forensic anthropology.
Enjoy and I'll see you next week!